This is incorrect. The paper shows that it can do basic math for problems it has not been directly trained on. The only way to dispute that is to twist that ver

This is incorrect. The paper shows that it can do basic math for problems it has not been directly trained on. The only way to dispute that is to twist that very simple claim into something it's not, as you do here by talking about all the extra math that it can't do. If I say I can cut carrots, it doesn't mean I'm claiming to be a world class chef. I am disappointed that a claim as simple as this can be completely misunderstood.