4 ms·
It's disappointing that this kind of thing is possible in relation to the sophistication and competence of a regime. Or maybe I should say that 2020 is a disap
by dalbasal 6y ago
It's disappointing that this kind of thing is possible in relation to the sophistication and competence of a regime.
Or maybe I should say that 2020 is a disappointment, from a 2005 perspective. The internet was supposed to be free. The ability to use it for political change democratically was supposed to be built in, innate.
This wasn't supposed to be a rare and fortunate blip, a soon-to-be-closed loophole in an app that . Internal security office around the world are currently reviewing their susceptibility to Telegram-based "attacks."
Even in democratic countries, we're increasingly seeing the internet's ability to lead to political organizing as dubious... something that must be controlled.
- danlugo92 6y agohttps://gun.eco/ https://gun.eco/
- jacobwilliamroy 6y agoI'm surprised that Telegram is proudly proclaiming itself to be sponsoring regime change in a foreign country. Seems kinda... gauche? I mean, that's still frowned upon right? Is my mindset antiquated?