3 ms·
I'm not sure why you've brought up Signal, they're completely different platforms. Signal focuses on secure communication, Telegram has a secure communication
by skyyler 6y ago
I'm not sure why you've brought up Signal, they're completely different platforms.
Signal focuses on secure communication, Telegram has a secure communication feature... But also a social network of group chats and channels that link to each other; and that's the focus of this article.
- gjs278 6y agohe brought it up because someone was paid to write nice things about telegram, so they found a guy using that when signal asks for an article, someone will be quoted as how signal was helpful
- shawnz 6y agoIt was just an example of a product which could be touted as enabling protestors. The other use cases of Telegram could be serviced by other apps. There are plenty of non-E2E social networks available just like Telegram. EDIT: Unfortunately postmodernbrute I am not able to reply to your comment. But I am not trying to deny that Telegram has caught a wave of popularity among Belarusians and others. What I am saying is that Telegram likely only has that trust because of puff pieces like this. It is not because of any technological superiority or unique feature that it provides (since it isn't/there aren't any).
- postmodernbrute 6y agoBut there wasn't another communication tool that was similarly popular and trusted among the Belarus people. And that, is the difference. Their choice in this protest matters much more to the reporting than your opinion as an outsider.