> For it's era, it had very very high scale for an RTS game > So the game could only progress at the speed of the slowest player's computer. And SupCom was VER

> For it's era, it had very very high scale for an RTS game > So the game could only progress at the speed of the slowest player's computer. And SupCom was VERY compute intensive. It might surprise you to learn that these statements are still true! SupCom:FA (still playable by buying a copy and through the third party FAF launcher; they have even fixed most of the desyncs, it's very stable these days) is probably still the largest scale RTS out there (even planetary annihilation only feels larger). And it still requires a top-tier gaming rig to play. The reason for this is pretty straightforward, CPUs actually haven't gotten faster for well programmed, cache aware, tight-looped CPU bound operations in the last 15 years. And in fact there are arguments for why something like SupCom:FA would be difficult to make today given the industry's reliance on game engines. And games are still rarely threaded more than SupCom was (e.g. game logic thread, render thread), so until someone can get back to the low level excellence of SupCom:FA and then design and implement a concurrent game logic loop for it that actually parallelizes well, I think it will remain the king of high scale RTS for quite a while. https://youtu.be/DEhp5eCwgSI?t=3304 https://youtu.be/DEhp5eCwgSI?t=3304 (to see why this game is awesome)