3 ms·
>It is uncommon to the successful ones. Exactly. People love to point at Amazon as long unprofitable, but don't realize the company was generating massive cas
by itsoktocry 6y ago
>It is uncommon to the successful ones.
Exactly. People love to point at Amazon as long unprofitable, but don't realize the company was generating massive cash flows for reinvestment, too.
There's no inherent reason startups or tech companies should lose money endlessly.
- ttymck 6y agoSoftbank is responsible for spreading that assumption, no? Fairly recently? (Uber, et al.)
- govg 6y agoI mean, there are two things here a) even Softbank doesn't assume indefinite losses/ unknown profitability, they have an exit horizon in mind that just happens to be larger than that of most other funds, and b) a lot of tech startups that have IPO'ed in the recent past have all been unprofitable when going public, and Softbank isn't responsible for most of them. A notable exception was Zoom ( I'm talking about last year ) who were profitable before the IPO, as far as I remember.
- plorkyeran 6y agoThere is also a huge difference between not making a profit and burning money. Amazon made it past the point of having a runway very quickly.