2 ms·
"Components" may have been the wrong term. I meant to say that you can give WEs access to something that lets them access the same things that JS running in the
by Dagger2 6y ago
"Components" may have been the wrong term. I meant to say that you can give WEs access to something that lets them access the same things that JS running in the browser can. My understanding is that this is currently most easily done via XPCOM interfaces accessible from |Components|, but I wasn't trying to suggest that it needed to be done via XPCOM. Do it using whatever technology the browser itself is using.
- Yoric 6y agoThis is what happens with WebExtensions experiments. Of course, it breaks all the time.