3 ms·
Frame rate was slow when filmed. Looks about right if you slow it down to 50% in youtube. Maybe somebody could run it through some interpolation software...
by Gravityloss 6y ago
Frame rate was slow when filmed. Looks about right if you slow it down to 50% in youtube. Maybe somebody could run it through some interpolation software...
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- polyamid23 6y agoI think its about the video at bottom of the page. This one is slowed down.
- gattilorenz 6y agoupscaled, interpolated and colorized by AI: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQs5VxNPhzk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EQs5VxNPhzk
- fock 6y agolook, how every house is beige and changes color. I sincerely enjoy the bw-version much more.
- gattilorenz 6y agoColorization is far from perfect indeed. I'm not sure how they model the temporal dimension (recognizing the same object in the prev/next frame and painting it of the same color - unless it has to be different because of shadows, lighting change, etc.) in these neural nets, does anyone know?
- rokweom 6y agoI wish publishing pre-sound era films in their original framerate was a common practice. However, for some reason it seems to be beyond the scope of people handling these restorations.