2 ms·
I'd say it's very unlikely. In super cheap eMMC the controller usually has the largest chance of dying early, but a proper 8GB eMMC modules really isn't that ex
by float4 6y ago
I'd say it's very unlikely. In super cheap eMMC the controller usually has the largest chance of dying early, but a proper 8GB eMMC modules really isn't that expensive, so I don't think they saved money there.
If the controller doesn't die, then the next reliability issue for your eMMC module is probably NAND wear. The ReMarkable has an 8GB eMMC module. Such a module can probably manage at least 1TB TBW (Total Bytes Written), and you won't reach that too quickly: the OS will eat a significant chunk of that 1TB, but apart from that all you do on this device is reading, writing and drawing. Those tasks do not require many program/erase cycles on the NAND at all, so I'd say it would take many years before you've worn out the NAND blocks.
- cptskippy 6y ago> In super cheap eMMC the controller usually has the largest chance of dying early Why is that? One would assume the NAND was the most likely point of failure.
- monocasa 6y agoOn SD Cards at least, I've seen the software bugs in the FTL lose track of sectors more often when I've had the tooling to tell the difference. There's some terrible code in those things.
- cptskippy 6y agoI had heard that SD cards were bad but I was under the impression eMMC was in a completely different class.