3 ms·
> Neither of those groups have decreased individual leverage. Huh? Sure they do. The MLB negotiated agreement is terrible for top performers, who are paid clos
by umanwizard 6y ago
> Neither of those groups have decreased individual leverage.
Huh? Sure they do. The MLB negotiated agreement is terrible for top performers, who are paid close to the league minimum salary for the first three years of their career, and an arbitration-determined salary for the next two.
As soon as the union-negotiated common salary time runs out, top players’ pay jumps several times.
- PierceJoy 6y agoWhat were equivalent players paid before the unions existed? Sports unions are responsible for the massive increase in pay over the years. Those top performers would have been making much less in the absence of a union, both at the start and in the peak of their careers. I personally don't view that as decreased individual leverage. > As soon as the union-negotiated common salary time runs out, top players’ pay jumps several times. That 'several times' level only exists because of the unions.