3 ms·
I'd agree with this only because the Schuylkill has better access and recreation. One of the things the article ties together well is Philly's aging sewer syste
by mundiff 6y ago
I'd agree with this only because the Schuylkill has better access and recreation. One of the things the article ties together well is Philly's aging sewer system, which, during heavy rains gets overwhelmed and spits raw sewage into the rivers.
I've taken note of the mitigation efforts of "rain gardens" and such around the city. Sometimes there's just a series of ditches next to the sidewalk. The series around the Zoo caught my eye, like "why is this here?". But the city did a great job putting plants in there and making it look pretty as well as functional.
One of the things I've noticed, especially during heavy rain is the crazy amount of plastic bottles that end up in the rivers, which then go to the ocean. We really need to do a better job with that, as individuals and in infrastructure like better sewer grates.
It's also interesting in that these green initiatives are helping kick the can down the road on major replacement/bettering of the sewer infrastructure. Both need to be done, but progress is progress. Happy Friday everyone!
- madcaptenor 6y agoI think part of this is because the Delaware is wide enough to be a divider - you can't comfortably walk across it, for example. (If I recall correctly only one of the Philadelphia-area bridges even has pedestrian access.) The Schuylkill, on the other hand, is easy to cross.
- sylens 6y ago> One of the things I've noticed, especially during heavy rain is the crazy amount of plastic bottles that end up in the rivers, which then go to the ocean. Tell that to half of Philadelphia that throws their trash in sewer grates. It's almost like it's taught to them in school