4 ms·
This comment is seemingly a reaction to the post's title and doesn't address (or even acknowledge) the contents of article. Do you disagree with the technical r
by calcifer 6y ago
This comment is seemingly a reaction to the post's title and doesn't address (or even acknowledge) the contents of article. Do you disagree with the technical rationale the author has presented?
- sprash 6y agoThe content of the article does not really make a technical argument. It just says "XUL can not be fast, because I said so". The code of Firefox has always been a historical grown mess with a lot of loose ends that need to be entangled. I'm convinced that a XUL version can be made fast as well if you spend the appropriate amount of engineering hours on it.
- Yoric 6y ago(article author) Pretty sure I didn't write that :)