Why do these headlines leave out the "in the top 350 companies in the US"? How much bigger have these companies grown in the number of employees? Is the job the

Why do these headlines leave out the "in the top 350 companies in the US"? How much bigger have these companies grown in the number of employees? Is the job the same for the CEO or more difficult? I'm also curious: what does an average/median CEO earn? Not in the top 350 US companies, but among all of them. This seems like an issue to me, but the way it's framed makes me feel like we're not hearing the whole story. If the companies in the top 350 are now X times larger than in 1965 then that seems like it would matter here, no?