> 27% of people have antibodies, thus 2.4 million were infected. 23k deaths, thus a 1% mortality rate. 1% would be to high given the data elsewhere. Did the p

> 27% of people have antibodies, thus 2.4 million were infected. 23k deaths, thus a 1% mortality rate. 1% would be to high given the data elsewhere. Did the population this study looks at have a death toll of 23k and what was the population exactly? I'd think a top priority in the world would be to tie this number down properly. And this study seems solid. The fact children are a higher infection rate in the study is not good, because it implies the mortality rate is higher again than 1%.