Right to be forgotten does not apply in cases where you're legally required to keep the data, or have other legitimate reasons to require said data, or there's

Right to be forgotten does not apply in cases where you're legally required to keep the data, or have other legitimate reasons to require said data, or there's significant public interest. But for _my_ photos, on a hosting service, it most definitely applies - if I request erasure, you can't keep them 30years in backup without breaching the law, that much I guarantee. > Politic and Canon filehosting from now on, Airbus Max and Foxnews ;) I know it's tongue-in-cheek, but Foxnews viewers typically trust them, that's one of the problems, right? And customers (advertisers) obviously trust them to deliver message to audience. Airbus is better trusted than ever, especially now after the 737 Max fiasco :P - but even Boeing was obviously trusted by their customers (whether that trust was misplaced is a different issue; my point was "customers must trust me" is in no way unique or particularly important for file hosting).