4 ms·
Theoretically, they could run more frequently. They could run every 3 minutes. Reality: that won't happen It costs money to run trains that might be mostly em
by burfog 6y ago
Theoretically, they could run more frequently. They could run every 3 minutes.
Reality: that won't happen
It costs money to run trains that might be mostly empty, so they are run less often, which makes them less used, which makes them run less often, and so on.
At best, reality looks more like this: https://www.mbta.com/schedules/CR-Lowell/timetable https://www.mbta.com/schedules/CR-Lowell/timetable
That's 21 trains per weekday. Weekend days get only 8 trains.
Amtrak is much much worse. At that service level, you could get 1 train per week, seasonal.
- lmm 6y agoIf trains are infrequent then stopping trains on the main line isn't a problem, and you'd really screw over the intermediate towns by skipping them sometimes. Reliable trains are a good thing. Frequent trains are a good thing. Your proposal doesn't help with either of those things and would waste money that could be spend improving them instead.