5 ms·

Mind posting the RAW files? I use the a7ii and darktable and it is perfect for me.

• sudosysgen 6y ago
  Sure! Here you go for the RAW file : http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=04290873673274490201 http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=04290873673274490201 Here is the SOOC JPG for the same image : http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=88911356095628235668 http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=88911356095628235668 Google Chrome might warn you of the risk for malware, but it seems to do for every good, free filehost :/ For reference, here is the screenshot : https://imgur.com/a/6RkiGyH https://imgur.com/a/6RkiGyH It doesn't do this for every photo either, which is even more baffling. I hope you'll excuse the poor composition, but I didn't want to publish a photo I might put on an account with my name on it :)
  • hatsunearu 6y ago
    https://imgur.com/a/0Pj2lex https://imgur.com/a/0Pj2lex Weird. I just did +1EV exposure and filmic rgb as is recommended, and it looks just fine to me. What version of darktable are you using?
    • sudosysgen 6y ago
      I tried two versions, 3.3.0+185, and 3.2.1-1, one through pacman and the other compiled from source.
      • hatsunearu 6y ago
        That's really wacky. do you also have the sidecar file? May be a bug.
        • sudosysgen 6y ago
          Yup, here is the sidecar file: https://x0.at/uSx.xmp https://x0.at/uSx.xmp I think it might be a bug too. Which is too bad, because Darktable is soooo close to the perfect photo editor (except for CA correction and sharpening, but that's neither here nor there)
          • hatsunearu 6y ago
            Just saw this. I'll take a look after work :D
            • sudosysgen 6y ago
              Thanks!
      • deleted 6y ago
        [deleted]