5 ms·
You've lost me now. You've gone between multiple topics and I don't really understand what your stance is. Are you saying: - There should be a limit on number
by yibg 6y ago
You've lost me now. You've gone between multiple topics and I don't really understand what your stance is. Are you saying:
- There should be a limit on number of hours worked (regardless of type of employment).
- Everyone should be an employee, and not a freelancer or otherwise independently employed
- Everyone should get benefits
Or all 3? Those are all to me at least independent things. You can have work hour limitations as a contractor or you can be an overworked employee.
- coldpie 6y ago> - Everyone should get benefits Yes. > - There should be a limit on number of hours worked (regardless of type of employment). I'm not getting into the specifics, my point is everyone should get the worker protections we have developed over the decades. If that includes mandatory time off, great, but it doesn't have to. I pointed to France's model as one potential example of how it might apply to non-employees like contractors. > - Everyone should be an employee, and not a freelancer or otherwise independently employed I don't care about the categorization so long as the worker protection regulations are being met.
- yibg 6y agoWhat about small business owners? If I open a restaurant I can only work 8 hours a day 5 days a week? I need to take 3 weeks off a year?