4 ms·
I would love to see this number for computational scientists.
by RhysU 6y ago
I would love to see this number for computational scientists.
- aewens 6y agoWhile anecdotal, its easy to run into issues like this[0] where scientist with little CS background assume certain behaviors in code that don't actually exist. [0] https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmjwda/a-code-glitch-may-have-caused-errors-in-more-than-100-published-studies https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmjwda/a-code-glitch-may-...
- Fragoel2 6y agoI don't have a clear reference to point you to but in many CS research fields these number are equally bad. Often code is not even published and is a complete mess when it is.