2 ms·
Good, science needs more of this. A negative result is a result, and if you don't publish it, then you end up skewing the distribution of results. Which can lea
by eloff 6y ago
Good, science needs more of this. A negative result is a result, and if you don't publish it, then you end up skewing the distribution of results. Which can lead to people (and meta studies) drawing incorrect conclusions.
- DrBazza 6y agoBen Goldacre talks about this in Bad Science. Well worth a read.