3 ms·
So, "The idea is to empower people, let them take risks and give them more authority over decisions," and yet, "The reorganization also puts Page firmly in char
by ozziegooen 16y ago
So, "The idea is to empower people, let them take risks and give them more authority over decisions," and yet, "The reorganization also puts Page firmly in charge of Google and its performance in much the same way Steve Jobs runs Apple.". So Page is trying to give people autonomy while also becoming a dictator? Those are two very different philosophies there.
- deleted 16y ago[deleted]
- swixmix 16y agoI don't understand what you're trying to express. You seem to be skeptical but don't offer an explanation. The reorganization makes sense to me which is why I don't understand your comment.
- dirkstoop 16y agoHaving people report to one person usually empowers them more than having them report to a committee. It also ensures 'vision control' in a much better way. So yes, and no, they're not at all different or incompatible.