4 ms·

I wouldn't say this is accurate. Well, some might use it that way, but as a kid this is the word we were taught for black folk with no harm intended, it's also

by drorco 6y ago

I wouldn't say this is accurate. Well, some might use it that way, but as a kid this is the word we were taught for black folk with no harm intended, it's also the name used in the bible--I believe it's originally from the bible.

legerdemain 6y ago
The Troubling Resurgence of Racial Slurs Like ‘Shvartze’ and ‘Kushi’[1] Hasidic singer slurs Obama at Jerusalem concert[2] Terra incognita: Israel’s k-word: Can Holon teach us a lesson in racism?[3] https://forward.com/opinion/361625/michael-twitty-black-jewish-relations/ https://forward.com/opinion/361625/michael-twitty-black-jewi... https://www.timesofisrael.com/hasidic-singer-slurs-obama-at-jerusalem-concert/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/hasidic-singer-slurs-obama-at-... https://www.jpost.com/opinion/columnists/terra-incognita-israels-k-word-can-holon-teach-us-a-lesson-in-racism-344425 https://www.jpost.com/opinion/columnists/terra-incognita-isr...
- jazzyjackson 6y ago
  drorco didn't say no one uses it as a slur, they were relaying their experience having been taught the word means no ill will. I don't really see a reason to try to prove his experience wrong.
  - legerdemain 6y ago
    They claimed that describing this word as a slur is inaccurate. This word is commonly used and described as a slur.
    - drorco 6y ago
      I think what happens is that overtime certain groups have taken "ownership" over the word by using it as a racial slur but originally it just means "someone from Kush". In Hebrew if you take a location and add "I" as a suffix it means someone originating from that place, e.g: "Americai"-> someone from America, "Kushi"-> someone from Kush which is a country occasionally used in the bible to refer to Africa. I guess in English there are also such words that originally had no use as a slur but later "denominated" to racial slurs. The reference to Kushi->Kof (monkey) is totally off. Doesn't sound similar at all for my native Hebrew ears.
      - legerdemain 6y ago
        Look, this is just childish equivocation. A lot of words that are considered offensive also have (or used to have) other, innocuous meanings. What you're doing is like a child saying "Nah-uh, this word just means happy!" A word is offensive in polite society because a population of people finds it hurtful, or because another population of people uses it in an intentionally hurtful way. Usually it's both. Innocent words can become slurs, and other slurs, over time, can become obscure and lose their power. For example, the "n-word" in English obviously comes from the Spanish or Portuguese for the color black. Despite that, it's an offensive slur. The older colloquial term in the English language for Romani people apparently comes from the word "Egyptian." There is no problem with being Egyptian. But many people find this particular word hurtful, and polite society is actively trying to retire it. Maybe you have personal ideas about what "should" or "shouldn't" be hurtful, but I'm surprised that we don't seem to agree on how people actually use these words in reality. "Kushi" can be a slur even if your grandma's pet name for you was "my little Kushi" and you love that word to death.
        Natsu 6y ago
        This is just the euphamism treadmill in action. The name for an outgroup becomes a slur over time because it refers to an outgroup.
        earthboundkid 6y ago
        The treadmill stops when you actually change public attitudes. African American/Black have been the main terms in American language for 50 years now, with some back and forth between the two, but no further replacement.
        Natsu 6y ago
        It doesn't stop, it just shifts to a different outgroup. I'm not aware of any societies without outgroups, are you?
        michannne 6y ago
- dahfizz 6y ago
  From your first article: >“Kushi,” or Kushite, became one of several Hebrew vernacular terms for “African” or “a black.” On its own — like shvartze, which is Yiddish — the term is not inherently offensive or derogatory, in the same way the word for “European,” in West African languages, is not at face value an epithet, but merely an implication of outsider status. >Context, context context. When flashpoints emerge, these words take on a life far beyond being descriptors.
names_are_hard 6y ago
The term כוש as a reference to a place is indeed biblical. And it's quite possible you grew up before it was a slur. But language shifts, and in 2020 using the term כושי (kushi) to refer to a black person is not ok. Same for the term shvartze in Yiddish, referenced elsewhere in this thread. I grew up with this term in my vocabulary and no harm was meant. But I wouldn't say it today, at least not if I was speaking English otherwise. In a fully Yiddish conversation I'd cut the speaker slack, though, especially if the speaker comes from a relatively secluded community that isn't experiencung the same drift in language the rest of society is. Point is, context matters. You need to pay attention to how words change over time and how they'll be perceived by your audience.

by drorco 6y ago

legerdemain 6y ago

The Troubling Resurgence of Racial Slurs Like ‘Shvartze’ and ‘Kushi’[1] Hasidic singer slurs Obama at Jerusalem concert[2] Terra incognita: Israel’s k-word: Can Holon teach us a lesson in racism?[3] https://forward.com/opinion/361625/michael-twitty-black-jewish-relations/ https://forward.com/opinion/361625/michael-twitty-black-jewi... https://www.timesofisrael.com/hasidic-singer-slurs-obama-at-jerusalem-concert/ https://www.timesofisrael.com/hasidic-singer-slurs-obama-at-... https://www.jpost.com/opinion/columnists/terra-incognita-israels-k-word-can-holon-teach-us-a-lesson-in-racism-344425 https://www.jpost.com/opinion/columnists/terra-incognita-isr...

jazzyjackson 6y ago
drorco didn't say no one uses it as a slur, they were relaying their experience having been taught the word means no ill will. I don't really see a reason to try to prove his experience wrong.
- legerdemain 6y ago
  They claimed that describing this word as a slur is inaccurate. This word is commonly used and described as a slur.
  - drorco 6y ago
    I think what happens is that overtime certain groups have taken "ownership" over the word by using it as a racial slur but originally it just means "someone from Kush". In Hebrew if you take a location and add "I" as a suffix it means someone originating from that place, e.g: "Americai"-> someone from America, "Kushi"-> someone from Kush which is a country occasionally used in the bible to refer to Africa. I guess in English there are also such words that originally had no use as a slur but later "denominated" to racial slurs. The reference to Kushi->Kof (monkey) is totally off. Doesn't sound similar at all for my native Hebrew ears.
    - legerdemain 6y ago
      Look, this is just childish equivocation. A lot of words that are considered offensive also have (or used to have) other, innocuous meanings. What you're doing is like a child saying "Nah-uh, this word just means happy!" A word is offensive in polite society because a population of people finds it hurtful, or because another population of people uses it in an intentionally hurtful way. Usually it's both. Innocent words can become slurs, and other slurs, over time, can become obscure and lose their power. For example, the "n-word" in English obviously comes from the Spanish or Portuguese for the color black. Despite that, it's an offensive slur. The older colloquial term in the English language for Romani people apparently comes from the word "Egyptian." There is no problem with being Egyptian. But many people find this particular word hurtful, and polite society is actively trying to retire it. Maybe you have personal ideas about what "should" or "shouldn't" be hurtful, but I'm surprised that we don't seem to agree on how people actually use these words in reality. "Kushi" can be a slur even if your grandma's pet name for you was "my little Kushi" and you love that word to death.
      - Natsu 6y ago
        This is just the euphamism treadmill in action. The name for an outgroup becomes a slur over time because it refers to an outgroup.
        earthboundkid 6y ago
        The treadmill stops when you actually change public attitudes. African American/Black have been the main terms in American language for 50 years now, with some back and forth between the two, but no further replacement.
        Natsu 6y ago
        It doesn't stop, it just shifts to a different outgroup. I'm not aware of any societies without outgroups, are you?
        michannne 6y ago
dahfizz 6y ago
From your first article: >“Kushi,” or Kushite, became one of several Hebrew vernacular terms for “African” or “a black.” On its own — like shvartze, which is Yiddish — the term is not inherently offensive or derogatory, in the same way the word for “European,” in West African languages, is not at face value an epithet, but merely an implication of outsider status. >Context, context context. When flashpoints emerge, these words take on a life far beyond being descriptors.

names_are_hard 6y ago

The term כוש as a reference to a place is indeed biblical. And it's quite possible you grew up before it was a slur. But language shifts, and in 2020 using the term כושי (kushi) to refer to a black person is not ok. Same for the term shvartze in Yiddish, referenced elsewhere in this thread. I grew up with this term in my vocabulary and no harm was meant. But I wouldn't say it today, at least not if I was speaking English otherwise. In a fully Yiddish conversation I'd cut the speaker slack, though, especially if the speaker comes from a relatively secluded community that isn't experiencung the same drift in language the rest of society is. Point is, context matters. You need to pay attention to how words change over time and how they'll be perceived by your audience.