3 ms·

The problem is that they put everyone lives at risk. It doesn't matter how convinced you are of your abilities if your life and the life of others is at immedia

• jacquesm 6y ago
  Noone's life was at risk. It was just mildly more exciting than a normal flight and well within the range of permitted stresses on that particular plane. GGP made an assumption and then reacted to that assumption as though it was a fact. We weren't doing loopings or Immelmans, just a couple of nice steep banks and a pretty steep ascent/descent. If the plane would have not been able to handle that it shouldn't have been flying in the first place. I've been through lots worse in single engine GA planes in rural Canada.
  • serf 6y ago
    question : would the pilots be at fault if the victim of the prank had suffered a heart attack or stress-related stroke due to the thrill-ride? Not legally, morally. I tend to think so, given that creating a thrill-ride is outside the scope and purview of being a private pilot. A professional, acting outside the scope of his profession, who seems to be acting with malice or disregard creates a situation that could quite literally kill a person who has certain conditions (even unknowingly). >Noone's life was at risk. I can't do the mental acrobatics that are necessary to see that as a zero risk situation. It's not just the airframe that the pilot is tasked with worrying about, the safety of the occupants comes first.