3 ms·
Right, except now instead of having the option of taxis and ride share companies she can only use taxis which have artificially inflated prices due to constrict
by manfredo 6y ago
Right, except now instead of having the option of taxis and ride share companies she can only use taxis which have artificially inflated prices due to constricted supply.
- michaelmrose 6y agoAs opposed to rideshare which had artificially deflated prices due to a temporary infusion of investors money. Maybe push for more rational taxi regulations?
- sushid 6y agoHow did that go before Uber showed up?
- purple_ferret 6y agoThe OP says they can't be profitable and you're saying they're too profitable at the rider's expense. Which is it?
- strbean 6y agoThe OP says ridesharing can't be profitable, parent says taxis are too expensive. These are statements are not inconsistent with one another.
- manfredo 6y agoTaxis are subject to the medallion system where municipalities deliberately limit the number of taxis that can operate. This certainly increases prices for consumers. If Uber and Lyft aren't profitable the they run the possibility of going out of business. The former is a definite harm to consumers. The latter is a possibility of loss for investors.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]