2 ms·
If Muni was any good, people wouldn't have used ridesharing. Ridesharing costs a bit more. This just shows that public transit in SF is so bad that people would
by twblalock 6y ago
If Muni was any good, people wouldn't have used ridesharing. Ridesharing costs a bit more. This just shows that public transit in SF is so bad that people would rather pay more money for a taxi.
- fizzled 6y agoDon't forget the stigma that public transit is for dirty poor people. Rideshare is a bit of a classist thing.
- indymike 6y agoNot really. 38% of Lyft riders start or end their ride from low income areas (right out of the article). Uber and Lyft have made it possible for people that could not travel from where they live to where they need to go, in a timely manner possible.
- opportune 6y agoHonest question: have you been on SF muni?
- BadassFractal 6y agoYou should explain classism to our female coworkers who get assaulted and regularly harassed on the BART and co.
- subsubzero 6y agoI agree about muni being bad, having took it for a while ago its really horrible. But in general people complain about SF and all of its public services, but do nothing about the clowns running the city/transit systems. Public transportation can work and work well, look to Europe for a blueprint. If you don't like the way the city and its services are run, vote!