> Then throw in that Uber and Lyft were truly effective alternatives to unionized mass transit lines operated in many cities No they weren't. It's called "mass

> Then throw in that Uber and Lyft were truly effective alternatives to unionized mass transit lines operated in many cities No they weren't. It's called "mass transit" for a reason - replacing trains and buses with masses of individuals riding in separate cars is not an effective alternative. While Uber and Lyft are more convenient for certain trips, mass transit still has a place due to capacity constraints. > If they were out to protect workers they had many more ways to do it. Such as what? Strengthening collective bargaining rights? Oh wait, you don't like unions either.