This really doesn't look like a real biology paper, and the content is essentially pseudoscience. I don't know enough physics to reliably distinguish gibberish

This really doesn't look like a real biology paper, and the content is essentially pseudoscience. I don't know enough physics to reliably distinguish gibberish from real physics, but I know biology and that part certainly doesn't make any sense. One very telling aspect is the lack of a proper experimental section, and the extremely bad figures. In a real paper you wouldn't find figures without axis labels. You can hardly see anything in the figures in this paper. Not repeating the experiment several times on different cell culture batches is also not a good sign. As is the lack of control experiments. The whole thing doesn't make any sense, it's an extremely far-fetched hypothesis anyway. And the paper takes enormous leaps based on extremely flimsy data.