4 ms·
The problem is that many drivers prefer having the flexibility to work 5 hours one week and then 50 hours the next. With the new rules, this would not be possib
by dntrkv 6y ago
The problem is that many drivers prefer having the flexibility to work 5 hours one week and then 50 hours the next. With the new rules, this would not be possible. By taking away this option, you are telling drivers they need to commit to Uber as a legit job. Considering the vast majority of Uber drivers I've ever spoken to use it as a side gig to earn extra cash, I will bet they side with Uber on this one.
The idea that someone can clock-in, work 2-3 hours, clock-out and then clock in again in 2 weeks tells me this isn't a real job. We need another classification.
And the problem here isn't that Uber's model doesn't work. Uber can transition to this new classification and adjust their business model to make it work, the bigger problem is that the drivers don't want it to work this way. The service works because it can respond to minute-by-minute demand. That's not possible with the new rules.
- tedivm 6y agoIf they work fifty hours in a week then 10 hours would be overtime. This is something that's been enshrined in our laws for quite a bit of time now. Outside of the fact that uber would have to pay them more, there is nothing stopping them from working five hours one week and fifty the next.
- anticensor 6y agoOvertime averaging arrangements are not unheard of.
- dntrkv 6y agoThe point is they may work full-time one week, and then not work for 6 months, or ever again. Once you start classifying people as employees, this low commitment approach becomes nearly impossible to maintain.