4 ms·
> and Der Spiegel has come clean about those instances which is the reason you can make that claim to begin with. After ignoring complaints for years and threa
by josefx 6y ago
> and Der Spiegel has come clean about those instances which is the reason you can make that claim to begin with.
After ignoring complaints for years and threatening one of their journalists for having the gall to question their golden goose. They only came clean about because there was no denying the evidence said journalist gathered and if they let someone else publish it they couldn't put their spin on it. Their world class fact checking team at least turned out to be a group of glorified spell checkers.
- jacquesm 6y agoAll of which has zero bearing on this particular article. Really, questioning the source like this is just another ad hominem.
- josefx 6y agoGiven that nobody else has seen those documents the reverse is an appeal to authority and I find it relevant that said authority has a history of embellish facts.