3 ms·
On the other hand, without the billionaires and millionaires crowding into manhattan, it might give ordinary people a shot at ever owning property in New York.
by helen___keller 6y ago
On the other hand, without the billionaires and millionaires crowding into manhattan, it might give ordinary people a shot at ever owning property in New York.
Unless you're in a cushy rent-protected situation, all the municipal services in the world don't mean jack when you get kicked out because you can't afford it. And manhattan stopped being affordable a long time ago, with large parts of the other boroughs well under way to the same.
- JumpCrisscross 6y ago> Unless you're in a cushy rent-protected situation, all the municipal services in the world don't mean jack We can’t afford the our affordable housing program without a quarter of our budget. And if you think homeless services “don’t mean jack” in a city that freezes in the winter, you’re asking for a humanitarian crisis. De Blasio is an idiot trying to stay relevant by tweeting obnoxious drivel.
- aravindet 6y agoThe article seems written to to obscure this, but local income taxes on those earning more than $10 million a year contribute 5% of the city's tax base, not 25%. It's 25% of local income tax collections, but the city collects other forms of tax. From the numbers on households earning $500k, it looks like local income taxes are around 20% of city tax collections. I would assume that the city has sources of revenue other than taxes. If so the contribution of the 10M+ households to the city budget would be less than 5%. Overall I don't think the overall thesis of the article - that NYC will be in crisis if all the ultra rich move away - is supported by the (few) facts contained in it. Not to mention the absurd premise that 100% of the ultra rich would move out of NYC if the policy proposal being attacked in article comes to pass.
- Arnt 6y agoThe city has many other sources of revenue, but 5% is difficult to replace. If you wanted to replace those 5% by raising taxes on those >$500k households, you'd have to increase those people's tax bills by a quarter, which is enough to provoke strong protest. If you wanted to lower the threshold from $%00k until you have half the tax base, that richest part would see a 10% rise. 10% is also enough to make people really unhappy, and a protest by half the people in the city is tricky.