4 ms·
> so really a non-factor. As long as money is a non-factor, sure. If the idea is "just pay the cloudy tax" then I'd rather be on something like Heroku that act
by ForHackernews 6y ago
> so really a non-factor.
As long as money is a non-factor, sure. If the idea is "just pay the cloudy tax" then I'd rather be on something like Heroku that actually makes my life easier, not harder.
- nodesocket 6y agoOk, then just use a single cloud load balancer which points to Traefik running inside Kubernetes. Then you can run as many deployments / containers behind it as you wish.
- ForHackernews 6y agoYeah, that's what I said: you need a load balancer, and traefik (or one of a dozen other ingress things that do basically the same thing - have fun choosing) just to be able to respond to HTTPS requests.
- pddp11 6y agoI've added some discussion/clarification of these issues in the post and addressed the issues in more detail in another comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24224189 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24224189 .
- treeman79 6y agoShocks me when people don’t know how east heroku is. Okay I get it doesn’t work for all use cases. But it is such a gold standard for simplicity. I moved an entire company from a falling infrastructure to heroku in a month. No downtime. Multiple environments and pipelines. Now a company is a year into Kubernetes with no end in sight. Developers can barely function