> That just follows from the premise of your question. That is a bit too simplistic of a calculation, since a tax rate also affects lower and upper class. You

> That just follows from the premise of your question. That is a bit too simplistic of a calculation, since a tax rate also affects lower and upper class. You might as well end up with way less tax income by applying that simple rule. And that complete proposal is very weak: only 666 pounds per month UBI, which doesn't even cover rent, and the average full-time employee loses 4.2K per year. If that is the best, ideal calculatio you can come up with, it is very weak, no?