4 ms·
Not necessarily, often the value of the land is mostly the value of the trees on it based on type, age, quality, density, ... As such, nature areas - especiall
by alltakendamned 6y ago
Not necessarily, often the value of the land is mostly the value of the trees on it based on type, age, quality, density, ...
As such, nature areas - especially when they have a protected status - will be worth less than areas where the trees can be harvested commercially.
- ajmurmann 6y agoIt's really a shame that our current economic system has no way to account for miniscule value provided to everyone. I'm glad about every tree on the planet and I'm sure there are many others who feel the same way. Yet that value doesn't get reflected. The value only gets reflected once three is out of the commons and logged.
- BurningFrog 6y agoI was thinking from a commercial perspective. A piece of land will have value proportional to how much (say) timber it can produce in the future. OP talked about turning it into "spent pesticide laden land", which to me sounds like nothing will ever grow there again. And commercially, dead land like that has no value.