The “Berkeley ‘systems argument’”, i.e., the room understands, not the human (why Berkeley gets credit for this obvious counterargument I don’t know) is mention

The “Berkeley ‘systems argument’”, i.e., the room understands, not the human (why Berkeley gets credit for this obvious counterargument I don’t know) is mentioned in the paper, but not refuted other than by some confusing thought experiment involving a joke that just seems to repeat the original argument.