3 ms·
Hosting live video in a scalable way is a much harder challenge than just showing it once somewhere. But it would have been cool to have a summary video of one
by est31 6y ago
Hosting live video in a scalable way is a much harder challenge than just showing it once somewhere. But it would have been cool to have a summary video of one day/night cycle, travelling around the world, maybe at 10x-100x acceleration. A one-time video also probably creates less legal issues as you can review and cull the footage (IANAL).
- blocked_again 6y agoCan't you just put it on Twitch/YouTube?
- blooalien 6y agoThere's always options like https://joinpeertube.org/ https://joinpeertube.org/ or https://webtorrent.io/ https://webtorrent.io/
- guerrilla 6y agoLast time I checked, peertube doesn't do livestreaming. Has that changed? Based on the name, can I assume that webtorrent also does not?
- blooalien 6y ago"But it would have been cool to have a summary video of one day/night cycle, travelling around the world, maybe at 10x-100x acceleration."?
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- whereistimbo 6y agoHow does livestreaming works through torrent? What about latency?
- catmistake 6y ago> Hosting live video in a scalable way is a much harder challenge than Totally. It requires figuring out and setting up arcane software such as Darwin Streaming Server, or Nimble Streamer, something like Quicktime Broadcaster, and Apache2, and also requires massive hardware resources, like a server for broadcasting, a server for shooting, and a webserver... that could be anywhere from one to two entire machines. That the WWW works at all is somewhat of a miracle. What webdevs do is more like brain surgery than anything else. ><