3 ms·
No, it is setting a wide range and excluding the extremes -- that is, people who aren't even within spitting distance of a good faith debate. 0.01% IFR would b
by rootusrootus 6y ago
No, it is setting a wide range and excluding the extremes -- that is, people who aren't even within spitting distance of a good faith debate. 0.01% IFR would be 1/10th of the seasonal flu. And 50% would be up there with bubonic plague. I feel pretty comfortable with my definition of 'reasonable people.'
- bluntfang 6y agoso what happens when all the people you think are unreasonable think you're the one being unreasonable? How do you deal with that?