3 ms·

They're not against voting. They're against certain people voting.

• metalliqaz 6y ago
  A few years ago I would have agreed with you, but now they really do seem to be open to the idea of full dictatorship.
  • henriquez 6y ago
    You know who else literally was open to the idea of full dictatorship?
    • onemiketwelve 6y ago
      Bowser?
      • LolWolf 6y ago
        Ganondorf?
• thomasahle 6y ago
  Most of the people they want voting are already voting. They are against expanding voting.
  • sonotathrowaway 6y ago
    A federal judge formally blocked North Carolina’s new voter identification law on Tuesday, ruling that discriminatory intent was likely a motivating factor in how the measure was crafted. The decision from US district judge Loretta Biggs could have big consequences in North Carolina, a key state in the 2020 presidential election that is scheduled to hold its presidential primary on 3 March. Donald Trump carried the state in 2016, but Governor Roy Cooper, a Democrat, won in 2016, by just over 10,000 votes. This week’s ruling was a blow to state Republicans, who overrode a veto from Cooper to enact the law last year. The measure came two years after North Carolina’s previous voter ID law was struck down as part of a host of voting restrictions a federal appeals court said targeted African Americans “with almost surgical precision”. African Americans make up about one-fifth of registered voters in North Carolina. Turnout among African Americans dropped six percentage points from 2012 to 2016. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/01/north-carolina-voter-id-law-blocked-discriminatory https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/01/north-caroli...