4 ms·
I'm directly responding to your (insane) line of argumentation: You're arguing that medications that have not passed regulatory requirements for safety or effic
by sithadmin 6y ago
I'm directly responding to your (insane) line of argumentation: You're arguing that medications that have not passed regulatory requirements for safety or efficacy should be sold to consumers, and that they can simply rely on retail pharmacists or the like as a stand in for the FDA's approval process.
- renewiltord 6y agoInteresting. Perhaps my English isn't that good. Please re-write "The FDA should be able to certify drugs as safe, effective, etc." in the way you understand it. In this universe, you can just get an FDA-certified thing. No stand-in required. > You're arguing that medications that have not passed regulatory requirements for safety or efficacy should be sold to consumers, and that they can simply rely on retail pharmacists or the like as a stand in for the FDA's approval process. No. No gatekeepers. The standard is you buy FDA drugs from pharmacists. If you don't want to, you don't, you buy it from who will sell it and you're on your own. It's the escape hatch. Just like you can buy non-Snell-certified helmets.