5 ms·
Well, when did "flatten the curve to avoid overwhelming the health system" become "lets close gyms, churches, salons, non-chain stores indefinately but keep ope
by BryanBigs 6y ago
Well, when did "flatten the curve to avoid overwhelming the health system" become "lets close gyms, churches, salons, non-chain stores indefinately but keep open Home Depot, Walmart, liquor stores, pot shops?" Or allowing gatherings for one political viewpoint as ok, but gathering for another as 'selfish and dangerous'?
There's plenty of inconsistency to go around. Add in different perceived risks and different risk tolerances, and what u see as necessary can be seen as narcacism by others.
- labster 6y agoOn the face of it the rules are very simple: stores selling essential goods are allowed to stay open, others must close. So taking each of those: Home Depot - construction industry is essential Walmart - groceries are essential Liquor stores -- groceries are essential Pot shops -- pharmacies are essential Gyms -- recreation is not essential Churches -- culture is not essential Salons -- culture is not essential Non-chain stores -- don't have groceries, therefore not essential Political gatherings -- opposed by the opposite side, nothing has changed Now you can quibble with some of the categories, but the rules aren't inconsistent. They do just happen to benefit the powerful corporations, surprise surprise. But specifically we went from "avoid overwhelming the health system" to "let's do the things that stops people from continuing to die". And those things involve avoiding human contact unless it is essential, mask wearing, and social distancing. It's not crazy that our government is asking us to do things that make us less likely to die. You know, unless you're a seatbelt truther.
- seppin 6y ago> There's plenty of inconsistency to go around. "The response wasn't perfect so shut down all current and future attempts to save lives." Cool.