3 ms·
I'd argue that the insistence of public policy to impose such draconian limitations on individual rights has a larger negative health and well being outcomes, b
by pyronik19 6y ago
I'd argue that the insistence of public policy to impose such draconian limitations on individual rights has a larger negative health and well being outcomes, but we have made the cost collectively born so we are all miserable, broke, and in bad health to prevent to save a marginal number of people who were already in poor health status. We are practicing socialism but applied to health and wellbeing, with the same results as economic socialism... everyone is miserable.
- Ansil849 6y ago> the insistence of public policy to impose such draconian limitations on individual rights If people gave a damn about other people, they would be following best practices voluntarily, which would make policy limitations a moot point. But they do not, so here we are.
- vharuck 6y agoYou say that like, if governments didn't impose restrictions, a new and highly contagious virus that can send you or loved ones to the ICU would not make people avoid crowds, spend less, and overall feel miserable.