3 ms·
> > That is not much higher than flu. > It's pretty locked down. You have an app that unless it's says healthy you are not allowed into any public place. The
by oarsinsync 6y ago
> > That is not much higher than flu.
> It's pretty locked down. You have an app that unless it's says healthy you are not allowed into any public place.
The explicit comparison to the flu doesn't really seem to hold, since the conditions applied to the infected aren't equal. If those carrying the flu were subject to the same conditions as those carrying this covid-19, the comparison would hold up a lot better.
> I illustrated it as a place in which there is so much mass testing that the mortality figures are more fact than fiction.
Mortality numbers as a % of tested peoples are hugely variable due to the differences in testing between nations.
Mortality numbers as a % of the population (deaths per 100k/1m) make for good comparisons, and unless the nation is engaging in outright deception, those numbers are reasonable to use as a comparison.
According to https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/data/mortality the USA has 52.52 deaths per 100k. In line with your previous, Qatar has 6.94 deaths per 100k.
10x more people have died in the USA vs in Qatar. What's going on?
- ReptileMan 6y agoThere are 10 times more cases in US that haven't been tested for is one explanation. Look - my country no one bothers to observe measures and our system is far from overloaded. I think that a lot of influential l people threw too much social capital on stay at home and stuff like this and now they just can't handle the situation if covid is less dangerous than thought. I think we are in the sink cost fallacy.
- oarsinsync 6y ago> There are 10 times more cases in US that haven't been tested for is one explanation. There are 10x more deaths as a percentage of the population in the USA than in Qatar. The number of tests / positive cases is not relevant to that number.