3 ms·

UL is not a government organization, but it's not completely disconnected from government regulation. Most states or localities in the US have building codes w

UL is not a government organization, but it's not completely disconnected from government regulation. Most states or localities in the US have building codes which are required to be met to be allowed to build anything in their jurisdiction. These building codes typically require devices to be tested by a recognized lab, of which UL is one. So there is a choice between UL or some other very similar organization, but you don't have the choice to forgo testing completely or to rely only on some completely different type of testing.

michaniskin 6y ago
Now of course the public would be better served if the UL could focus on their business without being subjected to the whims of politicians. But the fact that private companies other than the UL can at least compete for the job ensures that costs are reasonable. If the UL charges too much consumers can choose one of their competitors. Even if they have no competition right now another company will arise to compete, if it isn't illegal for another private company to start providing this service. I see no reason why an individual should not be allowed to build their house with whatever inspection regimen they desire (even none at all). A poorly built house, a house without the endorsement of a respected engineering body, will surely have this reflected in the sale price. I don't see a problem here that needs to be solved.