5 ms·
Or policy writers copy n pasted something off web. In my Mega Tech corp, we have security team that has created hodge podge of conflicting policies. For exampl
by fjwefjh 6y ago
Or policy writers copy n pasted something off web.
In my Mega Tech corp, we have security team that has created hodge podge of conflicting policies. For example, they ask some applications to be internal network only and other are accessible via web. But they can never provide their reasoning and get annoyed when we ask any details.
The worst part is that some of their policies directly contradict with each other. For example, policy is to never run as root inside docker container but then there are some applications provided by them that runs as root in docker. And every time you use it, you have to remind them that these are their apps or else they will ask you to stop running it as root.
Finally, I had pleasure of talking with one of their Security and Compliance expert. They could not even knew how to list file perms in Linux, and other a lot of basic ideas. This person clearly had memorized interview questions but had clearly no understanding of those concepts.
Only way to hide their incompetence is act elite and don't explain their reasoning.
- dragonwriter 6y ago> Or policy writers copy n pasted something off web. The fact that policy sponsors are more than anything looking to a single answer to end debate and establish uniformity is why policy writers can copy and paste stuff from the web and get it adopted as policy without a clear rationale connected to the organization’s particular circumstances. They aren't conflicting, alternative explanations.