3 ms·
Emacs of course has long supported menus but I think every serious user would agree that it's not necessarily a love child. I agree with you that it is the stre
by kleiba 6y ago
Emacs of course has long supported menus but I think every serious user would agree that it's not necessarily a love child. I agree with you that it is the strength of menus in general that they allow for easy discoverability of functionality. However, at the same time, Emacs provides other ways to the same end.
Simple interfaces are especially useful for newcomers, I agree to that point as well. At the same time, most power-users of Emacs do not use the mouse at all. While not everyone aspires (or even should aspire) to become an Emacs power user, the question might be asked at what point it would be wise to switch from mouse-based use to keyboard-based use as you progress? Does it even make sense to first learn an interface you're better off ditching at some point as your expertise raises?
- vvillena 6y agoIt makes complete sense to start using the mouse, and to keep improving our own workflows over time. Take the Mac interface: it's built in a way that allows users to just use the mouse, but everything is accessible via keyboard shortcuts. One of the key features of the Mac is the constant feedback the user gets, and the fact that this feedback is always the same, whether the user uses the keyboard or the mouse. Animations, selections, menu highlight when invoking actions... It's a very well-thought experience that makes things better for all kinds of users.