3 ms·
They did and failed spectacularly. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Phone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Phone
by satya71 6y ago
They did and failed spectacularly. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Phone https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire_Phone
- Raed667 6y agoIt looks like they focused on 3D gimmick, instead of building a good general purpose smartphone
- mattm 6y agoThis is a pretty entertaining long read of it https://www.fastcompany.com/3039887/under-fire https://www.fastcompany.com/3039887/under-fire
- speedgoose 6y agoAlready 6 years ago! I feel so old.
- bynkman 6y agoThank you. I came here to call out this. I will say that implementing a phone is not easy. Just look at the issues Palm and Blackberry have had to stay relevant. Nokia did for a while, but finally went with Android. At least in the American market, it seems that Motorola, Samsung, Google, and Apple are the winners these days.