4 ms·
Because they need your data. I don't understand how a website with such bad UX can rank so well when Google is now calculating CLS and other parameters like thi
by aphroz 6y ago
Because they need your data. I don't understand how a website with such bad UX can rank so well when Google is now calculating CLS and other parameters like this. Reddit is a mystery to me.
- exit 6y ago> I don't understand how a website with such bad UX can rank so well when Google is now calculating CLS and other parameters like this. you can still use the old ui via old.reddit.com i have no use for anything they introduced in the current ui
- thatguyagain 6y agoIsn't it one of the most popular sites on the internet? I can't think of where on Reddit the CLS is bad, do you have an example?
- aphroz 6y agoIt was probably very popular, but for me it has become like Quora, I don't understand how the information is structured and I find it not relevant most of the time.
- wilde 6y agoReddit usually has more relevant info for me than a raw Google search. My normal search behavior is something like search for “thing”, browse useless blogspam, search for “thing reddit” and then find a link to the answer through a comment or the like.
- mlang23 6y agoThe UX made me quit reddit. I delt with it (with a screen reader) for a few months. Then, I submitted a PR on GitHub to improve the accessibility of the site (just a very small addition). Then my PR got ignored for a few months. So I commented that I will delete my PR since it is obviously not welcome. Then I got some comments asking me to not do so, because accessibility is supposedly important now. A few months later, still no action. So I deleted my reddit account, because there was really no point in continuing to hurt myself with their terrible UX.
- schnable 6y agoThey are all in on AMP, even though its terrible experience on AMP.
- opportune 6y agoDespite reddit getting worse and worse over the years it’s still one of the best indexed sources of non-advertised/SEO/sponsored information.