4 ms·
> the protection afforded by masks is very light How can this still be a topic that's debated today? It's August now. We've known it for about half a year now,
by ganafagol 6y ago
> the protection afforded by masks is very light
How can this still be a topic that's debated today? It's August now. We've known it for about half a year now, and with "it" I mean "surgical types of masks protect others, N95 type masks protect yourself." That's it. There is varying degrees of protection depending on exact circuumstances, and it's all a game of probabilities, meaning it reduces risk, so is mostly meaningful on the population level, and less on the individual level.
But come on, how can this still be a discussion? Even people in remote Peruvian or Himalayan villages know it by now, the HN crowd definitely does. There are more memes about it out there than contributions to this thread.
- onemiketwelve 6y agoBecause we skew towards affluent and contrarian. Conformity is tough, even if it's wearing a piece of cloth
- ganafagol 6y agoHow is it "affluent and contrarian" to keep repeating some information that's so well-spread that repeating it is just adding meaningless noise? Masks don't protect 100%. Oh really? You don't say.