Thanks for looking deeper, I was hoping someone would. You're right about the purpose of the simulation. What I'm confused about is, I would expect them to say

Thanks for looking deeper, I was hoping someone would. You're right about the purpose of the simulation. What I'm confused about is, I would expect them to say that they ran that recording through SpiKey, and it output 3 (or however many) candidates, and the actual key was (or wasn't) one of the three. But instead, that bit.ly link is provided for "better understanding", and the rest of the section it's in is about the tool in general, rather than a specific test of it. Was it one actual recording they tested, you think? Do they say whether the actual key was among the candidates?