3 ms·
Indirectly, that's the funniest part of his whole schtick. He seems to segment the world in two: things addressable by pure reasoning, and things that require d
by _jal 6y ago
Indirectly, that's the funniest part of his whole schtick. He seems to segment the world in two: things addressable by pure reasoning, and things that require doing something.
He treats the former as his domain and clearly sees himself as a master thereof. And the latter you solve with bounties.
- 082349872349872 6y agoThe Critique of Pure Prediction Markets by Immanuel Köd (1781): > "That all our knowledge begins with bounties there can be no doubt. For how is it possible that the faculty of cognition should be awakened into exercise otherwise than by means of payouts which validate our judgements, and partly of themselves produce rationales, partly rouse our powers of understanding into activity, to compare to connect, or to separate these, and so to convert the raw material of our sensuous impressions into a knowledge of objects, which is called experience?" Edit: wow, what is SFW Rule 34 called? this is a thing. http://kenfeinstein.blogspot.com/2011/01/kant-on-betting-and-prediction-markets.html http://kenfeinstein.blogspot.com/2011/01/kant-on-betting-and...