3 ms·
This license doesn't require them to share the source though, just limit who is allowed to use it. Is that reading of the license wrong, is my question. They sp
by kemotep 6y ago
This license doesn't require them to share the source though, just limit who is allowed to use it. Is that reading of the license wrong, is my question. They specifically mention not caring if source code is shared but if the companies that utilize software licensed with this license are worker collectives or not.
Which is why I feel it would be better to advocate for the [A]GPL as that would result in the situation you describe.
- Kednicma 6y agoGoogle has a public AGPL policy [0], so advocating for it will not have the effect that you like. [0] https://opensource.google/docs/using/agpl-policy/ https://opensource.google/docs/using/agpl-policy/
- kemotep 6y agoThe page you linked says Google bans the use of AGPL code in their core products. Are you saying that since Google has a public policy banning the use of AGPL code in their products there is no use in advocating for a 4 freedom respecting copyleft license?