> Your second point isn't really relevant for a founder who can choose between one developed country with a wealth tax and another one without. This is an incr

> Your second point isn't really relevant for a founder who can choose between one developed country with a wealth tax and another one without. This is an incredibly simplistic take. When choosing a USA with a hypothetical wealth tax versus other existing countries, the contrasts are far larger than just a wealth tax. The USA has increasingly bad health/medical costs, university tuition costs, cost of living in affluent areas, deteriorating infrastructure, political strife, etc. It's important to talk about this hypothetical wealth tax as a weighted component of all of the likely decision points.